WRITE for ATol ADVERTISE MEDIA KIT GET ATol BY EMAIL ABOUT ATol CONTACT US
WSI
Asia Time Online - Daily News
             
Asia Times Chinese
AT Chinese



    Greater China
     Jun 28, 2005
Now the hard part as CNOOC chases Unocal

BEIJING - Fu Chengyu, chairman and CEO of China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) Ltd said Friday that his corporation was braced to participate in a review by the Committee on Foreign Investment in the US (CFIUS) of its proposed merging transaction of Unocal.

In a public statement, Fu said that CNOOC Ltd was pleased that Unocal had indicated its readiness to engage in talks concerning CNOOC's all-cash offer, and that CNOOC was prepared to start immediately.

CNOOC, China's largest offshore oil and gas producer, announced on June 23 that it had proposed a merger with Unocal, a major US oil company, offering US$67 in cash per Unocal share. The offer values Unocal at about US$18.5 billion, representing a premium for Unocal's shareholders of about US$1.5 billion over the value of Chevron Corporation's offer, based on its closing price on the New York Stock Exchange on June 22.

Fu reiterated that CNOOC believed its offer brought superior value to Unocal shareholders. "It is important to know that 70% of Unocal's current reserves are located in Asia, and that is one of the reasons why this transaction makes sound business sense for our company," he said. In the statement Fu reaffirmed that substantially all of the oil and gas produced by Unocal in the US would continue to be sold in the US, and the development of properties in the Gulf of Mexico would provide further supplies of oil and gas for American markets. Fu also restressed the commitment by CNOOC to retain the jobs of substantially all of Unocal's employees, as opposed to Chevron's plan to lay off employees, especially in the United States.

According to him, in preparing the bid, CNOOC always anticipated that its merger with Unocal would be reviewed by the CFIUS, and the company was fully prepared to participate in such a review with assurances to Unocal to address concerns relating to energy security and ownership of Unocal assets located in the US. CNOOC has said it was prepared to sell or take other actions with respect to Unocal's minority pipeline interests and storage assets as long as such a sale did not cause substantial economic harm to Unocal, and would reiterate this commitment to the CFIUS committee at the proper time, said Fu. "We are also open to discussing with CFIUS placing non-exploration and production assets under American management, through arrangements that CFIUS has approved often in the past, and are prepared to enter into talks with the CFIUS committee as soon as the committee is ready to do so," Fu said.

Unocal gets waiver from Chevron
Unocal Corp said on June 23 that it had received a waiver from Chevron Corp enabling it to negotiate with CNOOC for the US gas and oil company. The waiver was required because Unocal had already concluded an agreement in April for Chevron to purchase Unocal.

Unocal said it intended promptly to commence discussions with CNOOC on its proposed merger offer, which was $2 a share higher than Chevron's April bid for Unocal. Unocal said it had received permission from Chevron, which offered US$65 a share for Unocal, to engage in discussions with CNOOC and its representatives at any time until the date of the Unocal stockholders voting on the proposed merger with Chevron. Unocal said the date of the stockholders meeting had not yet been set, but it said its board of directors had recommended the Chevron bid to Unocal stockholders, and that this recommendation remained in effect.

Chinese experts see difficulty
Chinese experts said June 23 that whether CNOOC could acquire Unocal was still not clear, despite the high bid price. For a normal international acquisition, it would take two or three months before a final deal was made, said Xing Houyuan, a senior researcher with the Chinese Academy of Trade and Economic Cooperation of the Ministry of Commerce. But even if Unocal's shareholders were to accept CNOOC's bid, this alone could not assure the deal's success, since "in today's world, the trading of non-recyclable resources such as oil and natural gas has [become politicized]."

Since China began its economic reforms in 1978, more and more domestic enterprises are participating in international competition. However, the expanding international profile of Chinese enterprises had often met with resistance from their overseas counterparts, sometimes due to their inability to adapt to market rules, while at other times for political reasons, said Xing.

"There are two factors affecting the results of the negotiation," said Long Guoqiang, an expert from the Development and Research Center of the State Council. "The first one is market [considerations], which [are] favorable for CNOOC Ltd because of the high bid price it has offered; however, the other [factor] of policy may become the biggest obstacle [to] CNOOC's bid," said Long.

Even before CNOOC made its bid, two Republican members of Congress appealed to US President George W Bush to review the deal for possible security threats. In recent days, 41 lawmakers asked the Bush administration to investigate and possibly stop the CNOOC proposal if it was found to threaten US national security. Ron Wyden, a Democrat, called on Treasury Secretary John Snow to conduct a thorough review of the attempted takeover under the Defense Production Act. "I don't think being a free trader is synonymous with being a patsy," he said. And Richard d'Amato, chairman of the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, said: "This is not a free market deal, this is the Chinese government acquiring energy resources."
CNOOC head Fu insisted on June 23 that national security was not an issue. "This transaction is purely a commercial transaction," he said in a conference call with reporters. "We are confident that the US government will support this project," Fu said, calling the bid friendly and saying it would be good for Unocal shareholders.

But Chevron spokesman Don Campbell attacked CNOOC's bid, saying that "CNOOC's bid is hostile and not being conducted on a level playing field. This is a play by the Chinese government for global energy assets working through a government-controlled oil company." Ironically, even as Campbell made his statements, commercial cooperation between Chevron and CNOOC continued elsewhere.

The two firms have joint oil operations in the South China Sea, and a joint project in China's Bohai Gulf. Chevron and other partners also negotiated the sale of liquefied natural gas from a project in Australia to CNOOC, which also bought an interest in the field from which the gas originates. Fu also said the two companies were more collaborators than competitors, and Peter J Robertson, Chevron vice chairman, echoed these sentiments, saying that the two companies had maintained good relations and expressing his hope that the tone did not sour over the Unocal competition. Robertson noted that simultaneous cooperation and competition is frequent in the oil industry; for example, Chevron often finds itself in that position with Exxon.

Wang Gongli, president of the Planning and Engineering Institute of PetroChina, said that as strategic resources, both oil and natural gas were indispensable for a country. So it was not surprising that the bid by CNOOC would arouse a response from the US, as occurred with the recent acquisition of the PC unit of IBM, a famous brand in the US, by China-based computer giant Lenovo.

Chevron said June 23 that it would not raise its initial bid and maintained that it was still a better choice for Unocal shareholders because of its attractive value, clear regulations and high efficiency.

Skepticism abounds
In London on June 22, credit-rating firm Moody's placed CNOOC's A2 issuer rating on review for a possible downgrade. Moody's officials said they were concerned about the huge debts CNOOC would incur to finance the merger. "In addition, the review for downgrade reflects the considerable integration challenges that CNOOC Ltd is expected to face in bedding down such a large acquisition, given its lack of track record in this area," Moody's said in a report.

The price of CNOOC shares in Hong Kong tumbled earlier this month when the company announced it would counter Chevron's bid, made in April. At that time, investors believed that CNOOC's offer price was too high and that Unocal, which is the same size as CNOOC, was too big to swallow. Chevron's market valuation, at $118.95 billion, is almost seven times greater than CNOOC's.

But analysts said the long-awaited offer was better than expected because the price offered for Unocal was "surprisingly" cheap. CNOOC said it would finance the acquisition with its own cash resources of $3 billion, and with loans from its parent company, China National Offshore Oil Corporation, and investment banks, including Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan, and the Industrial and Commercial Bank of China. In addition, "The financing cost can be cheap because the interest of US$7 billion in loans provided by the parent company can be low," said Liu Gu, an analyst with Guotai Jun'an Securities (Hong Kong) Corp.

The deal, if it goes ahead, would increase CNOOC's revenue by roughly 122% compared with last year, according to the company. Predictions say the merger would more than double CNOOC's oil and gas production and increase its reserves by nearly 80% to 4 billion barrels of oil equivalent.

"Both Unocal and CNOOC are already primarily Asian businesses. Together we will be one of the regional leaders," CNOOC chief financial officer Yang Hua has said. The deal would also help CNOOC to overtake Sinopec as the second-largest oil company of any kind in China after PetroChina. CNOOC's executives said the merger would help it achieve a more balanced oil and gas portfolio, enabling it to reduce the risk from the fluctuation of crude oil prices.

In return, China's fast-growing liquefied natural gas (LNG) market would allow Unocal to accelerate the exploration and development of gas resources and position it as a long-term supplier to the Bontang LNG plant in Indonesia, the executives said. "This is a superior and friendly offer to Unocal's shareholders, and we believe they will seriously consider it," Fu said.

Bidding war possible
Many experts expect Chevron to raise the terms of its bid to forestall CNOOC's move. "The US$18.5 billion may just be a start; there will be a second round of wrangling, when CNOOC will probably lift its bid to US$20 billion," said a senior official with PetroOverseas who declined to be named. "This is not a knock-out blow from CNOOC, but the tacit entrance of the Chinese government means that Chevron has gone from fighting David to fighting Goliath," said Deutsche Bank analyst Paul Sankey. "It is crucial that [Chevron] does not enter a bidding war. If they do start chasing [Unocal], it's going to be a problem, since they're going up against the Chinese government."

But other analysts predicted Chevron would have to sweeten its offer. "Chevron may be forced to come up with a little higher offer than they initially did," said Phil Davidson, fund manager at American Century Investments, which owned about 2.3 million shares in Unocal as of March 31. "All [Chevron would] have to do is sweeten it. In my opinion, frankly, they wouldn't have to top it by much and I think [the merger] would go on through."

Bruce Edward, analyst for AG Edwards, said that Chevron was likely to sweeten the deal by increasing the cash portion of the offer, or providing downside protection to a decline in the company's share price that might follow a large outlay of cash to pay for Unocal. But Davidson maintained that Chevron still had the upper hand over CNOOC, even if the simple deal between two California-based oil companies had suddenly turned into a riskier bidding war with international implications. "[Unocal is] Chevron's to lose," Davidson said.

(Asia Pulse/XIC/wire services)


CNOOC bids US$67 per share for Unocal (Jun 24, '05)

Haier Group bids US$1.3bn for Maytag (Jun 23, '05)

Betting on the next Lenovo (Feb 12, '05)

Selling China to the world (Jan 15, '05)

 
 



All material on this website is copyright and may not be republished in any form without written permission.
© Copyright 1999 - 2005 Asia Times Online Ltd.
Head Office: Rm 202, Hau Fook Mansion, No. 8 Hau Fook St., Kowloon, Hong Kong
Thailand Bureau: 11/13 Petchkasem Road, Hua Hin, Prachuab Kirikhan, Thailand 77110